Integrated~Autonomy

Integrated~Autonomy
4.2
(448)

Integrated~Autonomy is perfectly suited for problem-solving and strategizing

With Integrated~Autonomy you can help a group move from ‘either/or’ conflicts to ‘both/and’ strategies and solutions. You can engage everyone in sharper strategic thinking, mutual understanding, and collaborative action by surfacing the advantage of being both more integrated and more autonomous.

Most of the challenges we face in the real world don’t have an easy answer. Different solutions can be true or happen at the same time.

Attending to paradox will reveal opportunities for profound leaps in performance by addressing questions such as: What mix of integrative control and autonomous freedom will advance our purpose? Where do our needs for global fidelity and consistency meet the needs for local customization and creative adaptability?

This makes it possible to avoid bipolar swings in strategy that are frequently experienced by many organizations.

Four Structural Elements

1. Structuring Invitation

  • Invite your group to explore the questions, “Will our purpose be best served by increased local autonomy, customization, competition, and freedom among units/sites? Or, will our purpose be best served by increased integration, standardization, and control among units/sites? Or, both?”

2. How Space Is Arranged and Materials Needed

  • Chairs for people to sit in groups of 4, with or without small tables
  • An “Integrated Autonomy Worksheet” for each participant and a large one on the wall.
  • Paper for recording activities and action steps

3. How Participation Is Distributed

  • All central unit leaders and local unit leaders involved in the challenge at hand are included
  • Everyone has an equal opportunity to contribute
See also  15% Solutions

4. Sequence of Steps and Time Allocation

  • Introduce the idea of Integrated~Autonomy for the topic at hand by asking, “How is it that we can be more integrated and more autonomous at the same time?” Have examples from past experience ready for sharing. 5 min.
  • Use 1-2-4-All to generate a list of activities that require attention by asking, “Where is there tension between our desire to standardize and the request for more customizing or autonomy?” 10 min.
  • Ask participants to work in groups of four, and pick one activity from the list and ask, “What is the rationale for standardizing? What is the rationale for customizing?” 10 min.
  • Using 1-2-4 develop action steps that achieve standardization. – Using 1-2-4, develop action steps that achieve customization. 10 min.
    Ask, “Which actions boost both standardization (group A) and customization (group C)?” See worksheet below. 5 min.
  • Ask, “What modifications or creative ideas can be adopted to move some actions from group A to group B or from group C to group B?” See worksheet below. 15 min.
  • Using 1-2-4-All, prioritize the most promising actions that promote both integration and autonomy. 10 min.
  • Refine action steps by developing some effective Liberating Structures strings

Below: Presentation materials we use to introduce Integrated~Autonomy

Purposes and Objectives
  • Develop innovative strategies to move forward.
  • Avoid wild or “bipolar” swings in policies, programs, or structures.
  • Identify the complementary-yet-paradoxical pairs that are important and manage the paradoxical decisions productively.
  • Evaluate decisions by asking, “Are we boosting or attending to both sides?”
  • Evaluate and launch new strategies
See also  What I Need From You
Tips
  • A productive starting question has balance and sparks curiosity or a search for what is working.
  • Draw on field experience and imagination in asking questions such as, “How can we do more of both?”
  • The goal is fidelity in a few core global attributes and differentiation in each local setting
  • You may need to encourage the group to try many experiments simultaneously
  • There often are no quick fixes and you may need to return to the challenge periodically with additional rounds of Integrated~Autonomy
  • When you start, the creative tension between the central and the local sides is relatively invisible. If the group gets stuck or starts to argue, tell each side to put on the hat of the other side and argue the opposite point of view.
Examples
  • Use Integrated~Autonomy for developing product strategies with your team. Instead of considering ‘actions’ for the various steps, you can also focus on features to find which of those work to satisfy many different groups of users
  • Use as a problem-solving approach when trying to find solutions for a persistent challenge that a team
  • Use it for conflict navigation in teams by finding solutions that work for both sides. Make sure to avoid mediocre compromises by re-framing both sides into clear needs. “How is that we need both [X] and [Y], at the same time?”
  • Use for coaching leadership and management in how to effectively support and help teams

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *